In Ace Branding's own comparison, traditional PR requires a retainer, offers no guaranteed results, gives no narrative control, and includes no reputation to revenue consulting. Ace Branding's model is the opposite on all four points. Traditional firms can still fit ongoing media relations, but their outcomes depend on each journalist saying yes.
A traditional retainer firm can fit better when you need ongoing media relations, crisis communications, or breaking news pitched to staff reporters on a deadline. Those are not the services Ace Branding describes. If your goal is defined press features with control over the article, a guaranteed model is usually the more direct route.
No. Ace Branding's own comparison with traditional PR lists "retainer required" as no for its model. Traditional PR firms often bill a monthly retainer whether or not coverage appears. With a defined package, you know what you are buying before you start. Confirm the exact terms of your package in writing during your consultation.
No. Narrative control is one of the four points Ace Branding uses to compare itself with traditional PR. Because you approve the final draft before submission, the published article says what you agreed to. With traditional pitched coverage, a journalist decides the angle and the quotes.
Ace Branding's founder had one too. In 2018, Luke Hessler had a bad PR experience and committed to changing the industry. The model that followed removes three common complaints: it requires no retainer, guarantees results instead of attempts, and lets you approve every article before it is submitted.